These are built to be a AT tire so this is aggressive for that style of tire. And people but BFG due to their great wear and road handling.
/\ /\ /\
This
Its about the most aggressive AT tire, meaning, its NOT an MT or a "Commercial Traction" tire, its an AT.
BFG makes more aggressive treaded tires, MT's, but, this is their AT. The original AT ko was updated multiple times with no model designation changes...but it has always been a long wearing tire with good traction for an AT due to the sticky yet durable rubber/silicone tread compounds. These compounds are more expensive than sticky less durable or, not sticky but more durable, rubber compounds...and its always had 3-ply sidewalls that resisted rips, etc, better than the 1 or 2-ply sidewall competitors.
The newer tires from the competition have upped the ante though on the sidewall strength, so, BFG finally went with a new model designation after well over a decade of the same AT ko name....and made the AT even better than the original as far as strength and traction elements. As they are too new/no one has driven on them much yet...the jury will be out on the wear, but, if anything like the line has been, I'd expect 80-90 k miles per set from these as well.
As most of the competitors are too worn to off road with after as little as 20-40k miles, the BFG AT's long suite has always been only needing new tires about half as often, as they tend to last ~ twice as long.
Of course, if you want MORE aggressive, say an MT tire, these are not the best choice (NO AT is the best choice if you WANT an MT)...and you should just GET an MT if you want an MT tire.