The Dumb Question Thread

Xterrorista

Charcoal Briquette
Supporting Member
Location
Denton, TX
You CAN. But they suck. 5100s don't have the valving to deal with that mess. Mine was hopping when it came out of pot holes. Lifting the front tires. It sucked.

Get the 6100s or Rads or really anything but converted 5100s with over 550lb coils.

Lifting reduces down travel. The preload accomplishes the lift. So yeah kinda.

You can't increase the lift and not change the control arm, steering and front diff mounting locations and keep the up/down travel #s you had stock. You gain up travel but lose down travel because the range of travel of the joints are still the same.

Stiffer springs carry more load. They also reduce body roll. The factory sway bar and spring rates are designed for best ride and handling. You increase the spring rates and you mess with that balance.

Now. I have been without sway bars running 650lb/in coils and Rads for a couple years carrying a full frame Warn winch in a full Shrockworks bumper. I'm satisfied with how it works but there's a little part of me that wants to drop back to 600lb/in coils and put on a smaller sway bar like from a 2wd 4cyl Fronty just to see what it affects.
Hmm.. I'm trying to wrap my head around how my travel will be affected.. I'm fixing to put mine together and get them on. I went with All Dogs Coop springs equivalent to about 650# they say and will give me the ~2" of lift I was looking for without using a spacer. They advised to set the 5100s to 0.

Would this change the loss in down travel compared to a spacer lift? I've been up too long to visualize this..
 

TerryD

Total Tease
Supporting Member
Location
Covington, Va
Hmm.. I'm trying to wrap my head around how my travel will be affected.. I'm fixing to put mine together and get them on. I went with All Dogs Coop springs equivalent to about 650# they say and will give me the ~2" of lift I was looking for without using a spacer. They advised to set the 5100s to 0.

Would this change the loss in down travel compared to a spacer lift? I've been up too long to visualize this..

Lemme try this. It may take a few renditions...

20200325_102226.jpg

The shock sets the travel window for the suspension. Your suspension can not move more than the shock's travel. A spacer lift moves the travel window down.

You have the same travel as when it was stock but you've moved that window down to gain the lift. You "up travel/down travel %" is unchanged from stock (assuming you don't have coil bucket contact but that's for later). If you had 4" down travel, you still have 4" of down travel.

When you lift by using heavier rate springs, longer springs or the preload adjustment on the 5100s or Rads or whatever, you are keeping the travel window the same as without the spacer and changing your "up travel/down travel %" within that window.

Let's say (because I don't have a stock X or access to the actual measurements) you have a shock that has a total stroke of 8". At OE ride height you have a 50/50% of up/ down travel. 4" up and 4" down.

You add a x" lift top spacer to that shock to lift the vehicle. You have not changed the weight of the vehicle or the spring rate. So you get x" of lift by lowering the entire travel of the shock but you maintain your 50/50 split in up/ down travel.

Now. Let's say you pull that spacer and instead you use the 5100's adjustable spring seat to get x" lift. Now what you've done is gained x" of lift by subtracting x" from your down travel amount and adding it to the up travel amount. You are still operating in the same hypothetical 8" of travel, but you are in a different location in that travel window. (4" + x") up and (4" - x") down. Adding a heavier rate spring to lift or a longer spring will have the same effect as moving the spring seat.
 

Xterrorista

Charcoal Briquette
Supporting Member
Location
Denton, TX
Lemme try this. It may take a few renditions...

View attachment 13414

The shock sets the travel window for the suspension. Your suspension can not move more than the shock's travel. A spacer lift moves the travel window down.

You have the same travel as when it was stock but you've moved that window down to gain the lift. You "up travel/down travel %" is unchanged from stock (assuming you don't have coil bucket contact but that's for later). If you had 4" down travel, you still have 4" of down travel.

When you lift by using heavier rate springs, longer springs or the preload adjustment on the 5100s or Rads or whatever, you are keeping the travel window the same as without the spacer and changing your "up travel/down travel %" within that window.

Let's say (because I don't have a stock X or access to the actual measurements) you have a shock that has a total stroke of 8". At OE ride height you have a 50/50% of up/ down travel. 4" up and 4" down.

You add a x" lift top spacer to that shock to lift the vehicle. You have not changed the weight of the vehicle or the spring rate. So you get x" of lift by lowering the entire travel of the shock but you maintain your 50/50 split in up/ down travel.

Now. Let's say you pull that spacer and instead you use the 5100's adjustable spring seat to get x" lift. Now what you've done is gained x" of lift by subtracting x" from your down travel amount and adding it to the up travel amount. You are still operating in the same hypothetical 8" of travel, but you are in a different location in that travel window. (4" + x") up and (4" - x") down. Adding a heavier rate spring to lift or a longer spring will have the same effect as moving the spring seat.
Thx for the insight. That's kinda what I thought. I looked into it quite awhile and this is what I decided to get until upgrading it all down the road. I chatted with a CPL guys that used the All Dogs lift springs with the 5100s and they enjoyed it with about the same weight I'll have so we'll see. I'm done second guessing.

BTW, thx for the deal on the Warn. I ended up just going we with the XRC9500
smittybilt. I figure when it dies if I used it much I'll upgrade then.
 

KC!

Bought an X
I am having issues capitalizing letters in the thread title for my build thread. How do I resolve this?
 

TheCrabby1

I Smell Fishy
Supporting Member
Location
Burtonsville, Md
Time for my Dumb question ;; It seem's to me that having a snorkel facing forward would catch a lot of water when it rain's ? Do the head's pivot around to help stop that or is there some other way that stop's water entry ?? I ask because I HAD a Buick GS 350 back in high school with the functional hood scoop/vent's and when it rained at say med type rain shower the engine would be stuttering, at a serious down pour I would pull over and wait it out !!
 
Last edited:

Prime

Shut up Baby, I know it!
Admin
Location
Denver Adjacent
Time for my Dumb question ;; It seem's to me that having a snorkel facing forward would catch a lot of water when it rain's ? Do the head's pivot around to help stop that or is there some other way that stop's water entry ?? I ask because I HAD a Buick GS 350 back in high school with the functional hood scoop/vent's and when it rained at say med type rain shower the engine would be stuttering, at a serious down pour I would pull over and wait it out !!
Snorkel heads are fine in the rain. The water hits the back wall of the head and runs out of the drain grooves. The problem is snow. Because of how snow moves, it goes all the way to the airbox. My old YJ had a snorkel. First snorked vehicle I'd ever owned. Stalled on me in a bad snowstorm because the neck of the snorkel filled with ice.

So. Snorkel heads. Fwd in rain, backwards in snow.
 

General_Tarfun

Sliders
Location
Atlanta, GA
I've read through a few threads on one of the tacoma forums where people have been able to remove a coil spring from the front coilovers by leaving it attached, jacking up the LCA, unbolting the nut on the shock shaft and then lowering the LCA down until all of the pressure is released on the coil spring, removing the lower coilover bolt, and the removing the whole assembly.

I want to lower the 5100's I have down to the lowest notch because I'm getting annoying coil bind with the 1 inch lift perch and they handle the preload pretty terribly. I'd rather just replace the coils but I'm going to hold off and see which way the economy turns before spending any money on those so for now this seems like the easiest route. I can't use a rental spring compressor because of the lack of space between the coils and the method described above seems like the easiest/safest route but I was wondering has anyone actually tried it on an Xterra before?
 

IM1RU

Skid Plates
Supporting Member
Location
SLC, UT
You'd have to unbolt the UCA to get that much droop. Otherwise you'd be limited by the ball joints.

I find the concept dubious at best and scary as hell at worst.
 

General_Tarfun

Sliders
Location
Atlanta, GA
You'd have to unbolt the UCA to get that much droop. Otherwise you'd be limited by the ball joints.

I find the concept dubious at best and scary as hell at worst.

Ah forgot about the UCA. I measured droop the other other day and I have 3" with everything connected so I'm thinking maybe 4" should be enough to safely unload the coil.

I was pretty skeptical of the whole idea too until I watched a few youtube videos of the process and it almost seems safer than those clamp on kits because at least the coil is somewhat contained. For good measure before doing anything else I could run a few tow straps around the coil to the frame.
 

Prime

Shut up Baby, I know it!
Admin
Location
Denver Adjacent
You'd have to unbolt the UCA to get that much droop. Otherwise you'd be limited by the ball joints.

I find the concept dubious at best and scary as hell at worst.
th
 

Zack.

Has been dubbed Arnold
Supporting Member
Location
Livermore, CA
I've read through a few threads on one of the tacoma forums where people have been able to remove a coil spring from the front coilovers by leaving it attached, jacking up the LCA, unbolting the nut on the shock shaft and then lowering the LCA down until all of the pressure is released on the coil spring, removing the lower coilover bolt, and the removing the whole assembly.


I feel like I’ve read about someone doing that on one of the Nissan forums... maybe ClubFrontier.
 

General_Tarfun

Sliders
Location
Atlanta, GA
I'm trying to think through some suspension stuff and need a little outside help.

A few years ago PRG Greg put together a chart on TNX of the travel numbers most of the coilover options available for the X. He list 5.8" travel for the Bilstein 5100 on an otherwise stock truck but the actual length difference in the collapsed/extended 5100 is 4.71" at the coilover.

So I'm thinking the 5.8" of travel he listed is what it actually translates to at the wheel meaning the wheel can travel up/down 2.9" in either direction from its neutral position?
 

outback97

Wheeling
Supporting Member
Location
SLC, Utah
I'm trying to think through some suspension stuff and need a little outside help.

A few years ago PRG Greg put together a chart on TNX of the travel numbers most of the coilover options available for the X. He list 5.8" travel for the Bilstein 5100 on an otherwise stock truck but the actual length difference in the collapsed/extended 5100 is 4.71" at the coilover.

So I'm thinking the 5.8" of travel he listed is what it actually translates to at the wheel meaning the wheel can travel up/down 2.9" in either direction from its neutral position?

I remember reading Greg's thread over there, have you seen this other one though? Some good info re: shock and wheel travel numbers.

https://www.thenewx.org/threads/strut-length-and-travel-comparison.59917/
 

General_Tarfun

Sliders
Location
Atlanta, GA
I remember reading Greg's thread over there, have you seen this other one though? Some good info re: shock and wheel travel numbers.

https://www.thenewx.org/threads/strut-length-and-travel-comparison.59917/

That one I found first for some reason. The difference in numbers I thought was weird, I lean towards trusting Gregs #'s a bit more because I'd hope he knew the actual specs given his business. And then he list additional droop coming from the SPC UCA's but that has to just be allowing more droop that was already there I think?
 

TerryD

Total Tease
Supporting Member
Location
Covington, Va
I'm trying to think through some suspension stuff and need a little outside help.

A few years ago PRG Greg put together a chart on TNX of the travel numbers most of the coilover options available for the X. He list 5.8" travel for the Bilstein 5100 on an otherwise stock truck but the actual length difference in the collapsed/extended 5100 is 4.71" at the coilover.

So I'm thinking the 5.8" of travel he listed is what it actually translates to at the wheel meaning the wheel can travel up/down 2.9" in either direction from its neutral position?
Greg's post is probably the most comprehensive of its type.

What exactly are you asking though?
 

IM1RU

Skid Plates
Supporting Member
Location
SLC, UT
The answer to your first question is yes the numbers translate to wheel travel.
Sorta like Nisstec says T-swapped can get 12" of travel, which it can't, 10.5" is T-swapped travel and that is without the shock in the mix at all. Ball joint bind to ball joint bind. Period.

Think about it like this. The wheel is outboard of the shock, if you draw a triangle with the outside line being wheel travel, then draw a line a little farther in on the same side, it will be shorter than the wheel travel line..... that's your shock travel.
 

General_Tarfun

Sliders
Location
Atlanta, GA
The answer to your first question is yes the numbers translate to wheel travel.
Sorta like Nisstec says T-swapped can get 12" of travel, which it can't, 10.5" is T-swapped travel and that is without the shock in the mix at all. Ball joint bind to ball joint bind. Period.

Think about it like this. The wheel is outboard of the shock, if you draw a triangle with the outside line being wheel travel, then draw a line a little farther in on the same side, it will be shorter than the wheel travel line..... that's your shock travel.

That visual makes perfect sense, now I'm getting a better handle on it I think. Does wheel offset come into play at all by extending that outer point even further?


Greg's post is probably the most comprehensive of its type.

What exactly are you asking though?

I'm trying nail down where my front coilovers are sitting at travel/stroke-wise when at their resting point. I'm getting some really weird suspension reactions to road imperfections lately that make me think somethings off. I was able to measure 3" of droop on both sides which doesn't really seem to be the issue, it's the uptravel that feels like it doesn't exist. I jacked up one of the LCA's under the balljoint area with a block of wood/bottle jack as high as it would go and it only went up almost exactly 1". Took it out to try and stuff the front wheels, basically more of the same thing, maybe slightly more travel but definitely not enough.
 

General_Tarfun

Sliders
Location
Atlanta, GA
have choices an AT or a MT not my dd but I hate the noise,, more rock and dirt where I live thoughts?

I read this last night as meaning auto or manual transmission but you lost me at at noise and rocks lol. Now that I've slept and my brain is working again if not a DD I'd lean towards MT's although I love my Toyo Open Country AT II's, here's the tread at 44,500 miles:
IT2or5w.jpg
 

General_Tarfun

Sliders
Location
Atlanta, GA
No it doesn't Because wheel offset doesn't extend the same line of the triangle. That would be extending the bottom flat line of the triangle.

Extending that bottom line would increase leverage, similar to a cheater pipe on a breaker bar so I'm thinking that could end up making the spring rate feel softer than it actually is. Or am I way off base?
 

westslope

Wheeling
have choices an AT or a MT not my dd but I hate the noise,, more rock and dirt where I live thoughts?
If you are serious about noise and rolling resistance, go with M&S/4 season tires. I never have a problem on loose rock on steep surfaces, old logging roads or skidder trails, vegetation growth permitting.
 
Top